My Facebook Graph Search Notes

All you need to know about Facebook Graph Search

Facebook chief executive 010

These are the notes I made based on last night’s research, and the best links I’ve seen shared so far. All the “Tips” posts seem a little premature given the limited Beta roll out.

Facebook’s recommendation to Brands

  1. Make sure your Page, Place or App information is complete and up to date
  2. Strengthen your connections.

So — business as usual there, then. Get your Page in order, grow your fans.

Facebook’s “Introducing Graph Search” (and waiting list sign-up)

Implicitly, this is a better way to search Facebook. You want to find that girl you met last night at that guy’s party and you can’t remember her name? Want to make a list of all your friends who live in that town you’re visiting? Here you go.

Primarily, this will improve the Facebook user experience.

NB: The beta is rolling out in US only.

The Verge’s liveblog (with photos)

NB: The whole top bar title area becomes a search bar?


Chad Wittman’s “Is This The Facebook Search We’ve Been Waiting For?”

A late, but useful addition to this list. Chad points out:

Businesses with a physical location, AKA local businesses, will benefit the most from Graph Search. The second most benefitted businesses will be ecommerce. This should hold true at least through the initial phases of Graph Search. These businesses have the easiest input signals into the Graph Search algorithm, while also possessing clear-cut opportunities to obtain sales.

But points out many of the potential flies in the ointment, notably that the problem Graph Search is being hired to solve isn’t necessarily clear, or well-recognised.

Jesse Brown’s “Facebook’s B.S.-powered search engine”

Brown points out that the quality of the behavioural and surrendered data that Facebook is relying on is patchy at best. This will feed back into user experience.

Graph Search is only as good as the information we give to Facebook. And my Facebook information is garbage.

My profile does not include my employers or my alma mater. I don’t “check-in” when I visit a location, nor do I rate restaurants or movies on Facebook. I don’t “like” things because I like them, I like them when I’m trying to help my friends promote something, or to make a cheeky joke.

Venture Beat’s “Facebook stock closes down at $30.10 after announcing Graph Search”

Stock is down after rising on expectations of announcement.

Investors, interested in a new way to make money off of Facebook, pumped the shares further up to a high of $32, but the lack of information about a monetization strategy or advertising in search caused the stock to remain in the red. It closed today at $30.10 a share, down 2.74 percent.

Just as likely to be because investors “buy the rumours and sell the news”. I suspect the lack of “monetization strategy” could be a red herring here.

Comscore’s “What History Tells Us About Facebook’s Potential as a Search Engine” (June 2010)

Early indications that Facebook users were already heading in this direction

the fact that we are seeing the first real signs of a burgeoning “traditional” search experience bodes well for the future potential of Facebook as a search engine. I anticipate that we will see this type of consumer behavior evolve along the same lines of traditional search as more dollars flow towards social media.

My take outs

  • This is primarily about improving user experience. Facebook’s search has long been its Achilles heel. Despite being more or less fit for purpose (it readily identifies the John Smith I’m most likely to know, rather than the most famous John Smith) it has always been a lacklustre experience. And yet, anecdotal evidence from Facebook suggests that users are treating it like any other search box; as a means to navigate the wider web. Furthermore, there are other kinds of search (“which of my friends live in London?”) that have been impossible to date.
  • Graph Search searches behavioural data (listens, likes, checkins) and surrendered data (profile information). Not all these data will be good – or rather, there will be a spectrum of reliability. Spotify Listens are probably good data (unless, like me, you share an account with a whole household.) Restaurant checkins may be heavily biased towards those offering checkin deals, and Page Likes to the biggest advertisers.
  • Graph Search may not lend itself to all brands I doubt that “what soft drinks are most popular among my friends” will be heavy volume, whereas “what restaurants are good in Dublin” could be.
  • User experience is key to the development of this search. User satisfaction with results will determine what kinds of search become popular. Facebook is particularly good at responding to behavioural data, and I’d expect to see the search become optimised for these (if only in terms of typeahead prompts.) I’d expect to see some interesting differences between mobile and desktop usage.
  • The Page has become more important. Until this announcement, I had come to believe (with many others) that Pages might be in decline except as a means of injecting fan-endorsed stories (and ads) into users’ news feeds. The new search may well restore their strategic significance.
  • Open Graph objects are increasingly important. This trend continues. Brands and retailers must Open Graph-enable their owned spaces and e-commerce engines if they want to appear in search.
  • Feedback from search data is essential for brands to understand how to optimise their search results Google has a strong set of planning and feedback tools. We know search volumes, search rankings. It’s not immediately obvious that these will be available to Facebook advertisers in the short to medium term (or in the case of rankings – ever.)
  • Bing optimisation may have increased in priority. Bing results will (as ever) be included in the results; although (I assume) only when Graph Search fails, or as secondary material. However, the news looks good for Microsoft (and, indeed, $MSFT seems to up on the announcement.)

What You Forgot About Facebook (and Why it Matters)

I feel I tend rather to go on about this — but it bears repeating. Your Facebook audience isn’t connecting during work hours on weekdays and there’s a strong chance that they’re not on a desktop PC.

I gave this version of the talk today at the Social Media Marketing 2012 conference. It’s been an excellent and instructive day — many thanks to Luke Brynley-Jones & Our Social Times for putting it on.

I’m sorry that the fonts we use don’t really come out well on SlideShare; but you should get the gist. The deck is downloadable — please feel free to use any bits you want, and I’ll happily answer questions over at @mediaczar

Someone asked whether I’d offer a PDF version: right-click to download it here.

Links to some detail on the case studies mentioned

Social media is powered by cat ladies

I’ve been in training with Altimeter Group’s Charlene Li and Ed Terpening for the last couple of days. One of the case studies that came up in passing was the US department store chain Kohl’s Facebook Page (more than 9 million likes at time of writing.)

Kohl's Facebook Page

Here’s a quick flow map of the last 2.5k posts on the Wall between 18 August and 23 October this year.

We can see that there are ~2k peer responses to UGC posts (the yellow circle) or around 0.8 peer responses per post. This is a very high number: not what we’d expect to see. Continue reading

Lil Wayne and the Facebook breast cancer meme.

Another chapter in the “like if you hate cancer” story. Interestingly, user posts on Lil Wayne’s Page don’t seem to be visible to other fans; so did the initial impetus for this post come from Lilquan’s own social graph?

There’s a Facebook property, page_fan that I’ve been looking at in the hope that I can begin to unpick this kind of question: “does peer-to-peer activity on UGC Page Posts come mostly from other followers, or from friends?”

I did a little more digging. As I might have suspected (given what I’d already seen of this meme on Coca Cola’s Page) Lilquan wasn’t the only user to spam Lil Wayne’s Facebook Page with a “like if you hate cancer” post, just one of the most successful to date.

This chart shows the likes on ~1.5K user posts containing the keyword “cancer” on Lil Wayne’s Page between 27 September and 12 October. Note that four of them (including Lilquan’s) have broken the 100K likes mark.

I’ve posted the data on Google Docs as an Excel spreadsheet

How photos spread virally through Facebook

Three videos on Facebook Stories from Stamen Design visualise how photos posted by George Takei were shared and re-shared over time. Stamen’s work is always wonderful — this is remarkable.

There’s no rubric, but I’m assuming that this is a form of network graph — where each node may itself become the source of new edges.

What’s interesting, if that’s the case, is how only a few shares lead to huge bursty cascades of sharing. I’ve seen this before on much smaller data sets:

There’s a potentially useful paper, The Dynamics of Viral Marketing, (Leskovec et al., 2007) that addresses this phenomenon. I’d be grateful for links to other papers — or your thoughts.

Thanks to somerandomnerd for the link.

Coca Cola and the Breast Cancer Awareness Meme

I’ve collected over 1,100 posts from Coca Cola’s Facebook Page that follow (more or less) this format:

Coca cola, I have a proposal. You have 9million followers if I can get 2million likes, you have to change one of the colors on your cans to pink. And you have to donate 30% of the profits to research for the cure of breast cancer.

So people like it up!!! (source)

Nearly all of them have been posted in the past week. The chart above shows (on a log scale) how many Post Likes each of them has received.

> summary(data$likes)

Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.

0 2 10 1655 49 360000

There’s a little bit of evidence (the “9million followers” error — Coca Cola had more than 52m followers when this was posted) that this meme has jumped here from another Page.

Log Scales

I’m learning at long last how changing scales can expose patterns. Today I’ve been looking at the Facebook Page of Marks & Spencer (a UK retailer.)

Using a linear scale on the y-axis, we see how engagement has increased rapidly over recent months. That’s pretty much text book stuff for a well-run Page.

Marks linear

But by dropping a log2(x) scale onto the y-axis (why log 2? I was experimenting after reading When Should I Use Logarithmic Scales in My Charts and Graphs?) we can see a couple of strange patterns emerging.

Marks log 2

Notice the distinct vertical lines around October and December 2011, and again in February 2012? Also the horizontal lines that extend from around January to April 2012?

Both can — it turns out — be explained by odd posting behaviour related to photo albums; and could raise some interesting issues of what is and what isn’t best practice.

But the short point is; I wouldn’t have seen it but for the log scale.

Does Facebook fake their numbers?

I don’t like commenting on news stories; I’m not really that kind of blogger (I don’t know what kind of blogger I am; but the prognosis isn’t good.) For one thing, it takes me a while to make up my mind about stories; to dig around and get the facts. For another when I have some facts, I usually discover that either there’s no real story, or that the actual story is so complex and nuanced I’d have a hard time writing about it. By this time, it’s a fortnight later, and no-one would be interested anyway. So I don’t comment on news stories.
Continue reading

If people don’t trust Facebook, why are you building your bank there?

Facebook privacy concern stories in mainstream media, 1H 2012

Early in 2012, DenizBank announced that they would allow Turkey’s ~30m Facebook users to check their credit cards and account information, and transfer money from within a Facebook App.

There’s a lovely case study that seems to show a couple of Turkish pirates who are happy to help you with all your banking needs.

The Denizbank pirates are here to help!

Six months later, the application has apparently been withdrawn having never attracted more than background radiation audience interest.
Continue reading